Recurrent SCLC Treatment
Standard Treatment Options for Patients With Recurrent SCLC
Standard
treatment options for patients with recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)
include the following:
At
the time of recurrence, many SCLC patients are potential candidates for further
therapy.
Chemotherapy
Although
second-line chemotherapy has been shown to produce tumor regression, responses
are usually short lived; the median survival is rarely more than 12 months and
usually less than 6 months after second-line therapy.[1] Response to first-line chemotherapy predicts for
subsequent response to second-line therapy.
As
in other chemosensitive tumors (e.g., Hodgkin lymphoma and ovarian epithelial
cancer), two main categories of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy
have been described: sensitive and resistant. Sensitive patients have a
first-line response that lasted more than 90 days after treatment was
completed. These patients have the greatest benefit from second-line
chemotherapy. Patients with sensitive disease respond to the same initial
regimen in approximately 50% of cases; however, cumulative toxic effects may
ensue.[2] Resistant patients either did not respond to
first-line chemotherapy or responded initially but relapsed within 90 days of
completion of their primary therapy.[3] Results from phase II studies of drugs such as
topotecan, irinotecan, and gemcitabine indicate that response rates to agents
vary depending on whether patients have sensitive, resistant, or refractory
disease.[4-8][Level of evidence: 3iiiDii]
Topotecan
is standard chemotherapy for recurrent SCLC. Patients with sensitive disease
may achieve response to a number of agents including topotecan, irinotecan,
taxanes, vinorelbine, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine.[4-11][Level of evidence: 3iiiDii] Response rates to
combination agents are generally higher than those reported for single agents;[12,13] however, many studies do not report the patients
with sensitive, resistant, or refractory disease.
Evidence
(topotecan):
1.
A
randomized comparison of second-line treatment with either cyclophosphamide,
doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) or topotecan in patients with sensitive
disease reported no significant difference in response rates or survival, but
palliation of common lung cancer symptoms was better with topotecan.[14][Level of evidence: 1iiC]
2.
A
phase III trial comparing chemotherapy with best supportive care (BSC) in
relapsed SCLC patients demonstrated that the addition of oral topotecan to BSC
significantly increased overall survival and resulted in better symptom control
compared with BSC alone.[15][Level of evidence: 1iiA] The study enrolled
141 patients with chemosensitive or chemoresistant relapsed SCLC who were
unsuitable for further standard intravenous chemotherapy. The median survival
times for patients receiving topotecan plus BSC were 25.9 weeks versus 13.9
weeks for BSC alone (P = .01).[15]
3.
A
randomized, phase III trial (CWRU-SKF-1598) of 304 patients assessed the
use of oral topotecan (2.3 mg/m2/day
for 5 days every 21 days) or intravenous topotecan (1.5 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 21 days). Confirmed
response rates were 18.3% and 21.9%, respectively.[9][Level of evidence: 1iiDii] Secondary endpoints
of median survival and 1-year survival rates were also similar (33 weeks vs. 35
weeks and 33% vs. 29%, respectively). Patients receiving oral topotecan
experienced less grade 4 neutropenia (47% vs. 64.2%) but more diarrhea of all
grades (35.9% vs. 19.9%) than with intravenous topotecan. Quality-of-life (QOL)
analysis (using a nonvalidated QOL questionnaire) demonstrated no significant
difference between the two arms.
Palliative therapy
Patients
with central nervous system (CNS) recurrences can often obtain palliation of
symptoms with additional chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. A retrospective
review showed that 43% of patients treated with additional chemotherapy at the
time of CNS relapse responded to second-line chemotherapy.[16] The majority of patients treated with radiation
therapy obtain objective responses and improvement following radiation
therapy.[17]
Some
patients with intrinsic endobronchial obstructing lesions or extrinsic
compression caused by the tumor have achieved successful palliation with
endobronchial laser therapy (for endobronchial lesions only) and/or
brachytherapy.[18] Expandable metal stents can be safely inserted
under local anesthesia via the bronchoscope, which results in improved symptoms
and pulmonary function in patients with malignant airways obstruction.[19]
Patients
with progressive intrathoracic tumor after failing initial chemotherapy can
achieve significant tumor responses, palliation of symptoms, and short-term
local control with external-beam radiation therapy. Only the rare patient,
however, will experience long-term survival following salvage radiation
therapy.[20]
Treatment Options Under Clinical Evaluation
Treatment
options under clinical evaluation for patients with recurrent SCLC include
phase I and II clinical trials of new drugs.
Current Clinical Trials
Check for U.S. clinical trials from NCI's list
of cancer clinical trials that are now accepting patients withrecurrent small cell lung cancer. The list of
clinical trials can be further narrowed by location, drug, intervention, and
other criteria.
General information about clinical trials is
also available from the NCI Web
site.
References
1.
Davies
AM, Evans WK, Mackay JA, et al.: Treatment of recurrent small cell lung cancer.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 18 (2): 387-416, 2004. [PUBMED Abstract]
2.
Postmus
PE, Berendsen HH, van Zandwijk N, et al.: Retreatment with the induction
regimen in small cell lung cancer relapsing after an initial response to short
term chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23 (9): 1409-11, 1987. [PUBMED Abstract]
3.
Giaccone
G, Donadio M, Bonardi G, et al.: Teniposide in the treatment of small-cell lung
cancer: the influence of prior chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 6 (8): 1264-70,
1988. [PUBMED Abstract]
4.
Sandler
AB: Irinotecan in small-cell lung cancer: the US experience. Oncology
(Williston Park) 15 (1 Suppl 1): 11-2, 2001. [PUBMED Abstract]
5.
van
der Lee I, Smit EF, van Putten JW, et al.: Single-agent gemcitabine in patients
with resistant small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 12 (4): 557-61, 2001. [PUBMED Abstract]
6.
Masuda
N, Fukuoka M, Kusunoki Y, et al.: CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for
the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 10
(8): 1225-9, 1992. [PUBMED Abstract]
7.
Perez-Soler
R, Glisson BS, Lee JS, et al.: Treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer
refractory to etoposide and cisplatin with the topoisomerase I poison
topotecan. J Clin Oncol 14 (10): 2785-90, 1996. [PUBMED Abstract]
8.
Masters
GA, Declerck L, Blanke C, et al.: Phase II trial of gemcitabine in refractory
or relapsed small-cell lung cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial
1597. J Clin Oncol 21 (8): 1550-5, 2003. [PUBMED Abstract]
9.
Eckardt
JR, von Pawel J, Pujol JL, et al.: Phase III study of oral compared with
intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin
Oncol 25 (15): 2086-92, 2007. [PUBMED Abstract]
10.
Ardizzoni
A, Hansen H, Dombernowsky P, et al.: Topotecan, a new active drug in the
second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients
with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research
and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group and New Drug Development
Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 15 (5): 2090-6,
1997. [PUBMED Abstract]
11.
Furuse
K, Kubota K, Kawahara M, et al.: Phase II study of vinorelbine in heavily
previously treated small cell lung cancer. Japan Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Study
Group. Oncology 53 (2): 169-72, 1996 Mar-Apr. [PUBMED Abstract]
12.
Smit
EF, Fokkema E, Biesma B, et al.: A phase II study of paclitaxel in heavily
pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 77 (2): 347-51,
1998. [PUBMED Abstract]
13.
Rocha-Lima
CM, Herndon JE 2nd, Lee ME, et al.: Phase II trial of irinotecan/gemcitabine as
second-line therapy for relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: Cancer
and Leukemia Group B Study 39902. Ann Oncol 18 (2): 331-7, 2007. [PUBMED Abstract]
14.
von
Pawel J, Schiller JH, Shepherd FA, et al.: Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide,
doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung
cancer. J Clin Oncol 17 (2): 658-67, 1999. [PUBMED Abstract]
15.
O'Brien
ME, Ciuleanu TE, Tsekov H, et al.: Phase III trial comparing supportive care
alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed
small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24 (34): 5441-7, 2006. [PUBMED Abstract]
16.
Kristensen
CA, Kristjansen PE, Hansen HH: Systemic chemotherapy of brain metastases from
small-cell lung cancer: a review. J Clin Oncol 10 (9): 1498-502, 1992. [PUBMED Abstract]
17.
Carmichael
J, Crane JM, Bunn PA, et al.: Results of therapeutic cranial irradiation in small
cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14 (3): 455-9, 1988. [PUBMED Abstract]
18.
Miller
JI Jr, Phillips TW: Neodymium:YAG laser and brachytherapy in the management of
inoperable bronchogenic carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 50 (2): 190-5; discussion
195-6, 1990. [PUBMED Abstract]
19.
Wilson
GE, Walshaw MJ, Hind CR: Treatment of large airway obstruction in lung cancer
using expandable metal stents inserted under direct vision via the fibreoptic
bronchoscope. Thorax 51 (3): 248-52, 1996. [PUBMED Abstract]
20.
Ochs
JJ, Tester WJ, Cohen MH, et al.: "Salvage" radiation therapy for
intrathoracic small cell carcinoma of the lung progressing on combination
chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep 67 (12): 1123-6, 1983. [PUBMED Abstract]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave your comments